Lecture 9 - Arguing Affirmative Action

Justice: What is the Right Thing to Do?

Harvard

Part 1 - Arguing Affirmative Action: Sandel describes the 1996 court case of a white woman named Cheryl Hopwood who was denied admission to a Texas law school, even though she had higher grades and test scores than some of the minority applicants who were admitted. Hopwood took her case to court, arguing the school’s affirmative action program violated her rights. Students discuss the pros and cons of affirmative action.Part 2 - What's the Purpose?: Aristotle disagrees with Rawls and Kant. When considering matters of distribution, Aristotle argues one must consider the goal, the end, the purpose of what is being distributed. Justice is a matter of fitting a person’s virtues with an appropriate role. And the highest political offices should go to those with the best judgment and the greatest civic virtue.

3301 Views
SUGGESTIONS FOR YOU
Lecture 4 - Configurative Reading

Introduction to Theory of Literature

Yale

Lecture 1 - Introduction

Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Faulkner

Yale

Lecture 24 - Apocalyptic and Accommodation

Introduction to New Testament History and Literature

Yale

Lecture 12 - Freud and Fiction

Introduction to Theory of Literature

Yale

Lecture 7 - Russian Formalism

Introduction to Theory of Literature

Yale